Review procedure

The review procedure for the Global Journal of Food and Agribusiness Management involves a rigorous peer-review process to ensure the quality and integrity of published research. Upon submission, manuscripts are first evaluated by the editorial team for their relevance and adherence to the journal's guidelines. If deemed suitable, the manuscripts are then sent to expert reviewers who assess the content for originality, significance, and methodological soundness. Reviewers are also responsible for ensuring compliance with ethical standards, particularly regarding the treatment of human and animal subjects. Following the review, authors receive feedback and recommendations, which may include revisions before final acceptance for publication. This structured approach aims to maintain high academic standards while facilitating the dissemination of valuable research in the field of food and agribusiness management. The review procedure for the Global Journal of Food and Agribusiness Management is designed to uphold the highest standards of academic integrity and quality. Initially, submitted manuscripts undergo a preliminary evaluation by the editorial team to determine their relevance and compliance with the journal's submission guidelines. If a manuscript passes this initial screening, it is assigned to at least two anonymous reviewers who possess expertise in the relevant field. These reviewers critically assess the manuscript for originality, clarity, and methodological rigor, providing constructive feedback to the authors.

The review process is conducted under a double-blind system, ensuring that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other, which helps to eliminate bias. Reviewers are tasked with evaluating the significance of the research findings and their implications for the field of food and agribusiness management. They also check for adherence to ethical standards, particularly concerning the use of human and animal subjects, and ensure that all claims made in the manuscript are substantiated by the data presented.

Once the reviews are completed, the editorial team consolidates the feedback and communicates it to the authors, who may be required to make revisions based on the reviewers' comments. The final decision regarding publication is made by the editorial team, taking into account the reviewers' evaluations and the authors' responses to the feedback. This comprehensive review procedure not only enhances the quality of published articles but also contributes to the advancement of knowledge in the field.