Review procedure

The review procedure for the Global Journal of Cardiology involves a thorough and rigorous peer-review process to ensure the quality and scientific integrity of published articles. Upon submission, manuscripts are initially assessed by the editorial team for relevance, quality, and adherence to the journal’s guidelines. If deemed suitable, the manuscript is then sent to expert reviewers in the field of cardiology, who evaluate the research methodology, data analysis, and the validity of conclusions drawn. Reviewers also assess the originality, significance, and potential impact of the study on the field. Authors may be required to make revisions based on reviewer feedback, which are then re-evaluated by the reviewers before a final decision is made. The review process is typically double-blind, ensuring that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous. The editorial team makes the final decision on acceptance, revision, or rejection based on the reviewers’ recommendations. Throughout this process, the journal aims to maintain high standards of scientific excellence and timely publication.