Editorial Policies
- Creative Commons License
- Publisher Policies
- Editorial Process
- Editorial Policies
- COPE Recommendation for Plagiarism
- Advertisement Policies
- Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
- Peer Review Process
- Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures (specific to editors)
- COPE Recommendation for Conflict of Interest (specific to editors)
1. Creative Commons License
The Creative Commons License allows authors of the Global Journal of Cardiology to retain copyright while granting the journal the right to publish and distribute the article. The journal generally supports open access publishing, encouraging authors to select licenses that allow their work to be freely available for reading, sharing, and redistribution. Authors can choose from various Creative Commons licenses, with the most common being CC BY, which permits others to use, share, and even adapt the work as long as the original author is credited. This policy helps promote the widespread dissemination of research, ensuring that valuable cardiology findings reach a global audience.
2. Publisher Policies
The Publisher Policies of the Global Journal of Cardiology outline the principles and rules under which the journal operates. The publisher is committed to maintaining high ethical standards, ensuring that articles are subject to rigorous peer review, are free from any plagiarism, and are based on scientifically sound research. The journal also upholds the principles of transparency, integrity, and accountability in all its processes, from submission to publication. This policy helps maintain the trust of the scientific community and the public in the quality and reliability of the research published in the journal.
3. Editorial Process
The Editorial Process for the Global Journal of Cardiology involves a structured procedure that ensures the thorough evaluation of all submitted manuscripts. Once a manuscript is submitted, the editorial team conducts an initial assessment to determine if it fits the scope and quality standards of the journal. If deemed appropriate, the manuscript is sent for peer review, where experts in the field evaluate its methodology, results, and conclusions. Based on reviewer feedback, the editorial team makes a decision on whether to accept, revise, or reject the manuscript. The process is designed to maintain the scientific rigor of the journal and to ensure the highest standards of research are upheld.
4. Editorial Policies
The Editorial Policies of the Global Journal of Cardiology govern the editorial decisions made throughout the publication process. These policies are designed to ensure fairness, transparency, and integrity in manuscript evaluation. Editors are required to evaluate manuscripts based on their scientific merit, relevance to the field of cardiology, and methodological rigor. Conflicts of interest must be disclosed, and editors are prohibited from making decisions based on personal biases or external pressures. The editorial team is committed to handling manuscripts confidentially and ensuring that authors' intellectual property rights are protected.
5. COPE Recommendation for Plagiarism
The COPE Recommendation for Plagiarism follows the guidelines set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) to address instances of plagiarism in submitted manuscripts. The Global Journal of Cardiology has a zero-tolerance policy for plagiarism. All submitted manuscripts are screened using plagiarism detection tools to ensure that content is original. Authors found to have plagiarized work, either intentionally or unintentionally, may face rejection of their submission and be banned from submitting to the journal in the future. The journal’s commitment to ethical publishing ensures that all research is credible and transparent.
6. Advertisement Policies
The Advertisement Policies of the Global Journal of Cardiology govern the inclusion of advertisements in the journal. The journal may accept advertisements from reputable organizations, but such advertisements must not interfere with the scientific content of the journal. All advertisements are subject to editorial approval, and they must be clearly distinguished from editorial content. The journal maintains editorial independence and ensures that advertisements do not influence the objectivity or integrity of the published research.
7. Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
The Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement outlines the ethical principles and procedures followed by the Global Journal of Cardiology to ensure fair and responsible publishing. This statement emphasizes the importance of research integrity, honesty, and accountability. The journal adheres to the ethical guidelines provided by COPE and is committed to handling issues such as conflicts of interest, plagiarism, data falsification, and authorship disputes in an impartial and transparent manner. This policy ensures the credibility of the journal and the research it publishes.
8. Peer Review Process
The Peer Review Process is central to the editorial practices of the Global Journal of Cardiology. Every manuscript submitted to the journal undergoes a rigorous peer review by experts in the field of cardiology. The process ensures that the research is scientifically sound, the methodology is robust, and the conclusions are valid. Reviewers are asked to assess the quality of the manuscript objectively, provide constructive feedback to the authors, and make recommendations for acceptance, revision, or rejection. The peer review process helps maintain the high standards of the journal and ensures that only quality research is published.
9. Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures (specific to editors)
The Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures policy requires that editors disclose any financial or personal relationships that could affect their impartiality in reviewing manuscripts. Editors must declare any conflicts of interest that may arise from their relationships with the authors, institutions, or sponsors of the research. This policy ensures that the editorial decision-making process is free from bias, and that all decisions are made solely based on the scientific merit of the manuscript. Transparency in financial disclosures is crucial for maintaining the credibility and trustworthiness of the journal.
10. COPE Recommendation for Conflict of Interest (specific to editors)
The COPE Recommendation for Conflict of Interest (specific to editors) provides specific guidelines for editors to manage and disclose conflicts of interest during the editorial process. Editors must avoid making decisions based on personal, financial, or professional interests that could compromise the objectivity of the manuscript evaluation. If a conflict arises, editors are required to recuse themselves from handling the manuscript and allow another editor to take over. The Global Journal of Cardiology adheres to these guidelines to maintain a transparent and fair editorial process, ensuring the integrity of the journal.
