Review procedure

The review procedure for the African Journal of Pig Farming is designed to uphold the highest standards of academic integrity and quality in the publication of research related to pig farming and related disciplines. Upon submission, each manuscript undergoes an initial screening by the editorial team to assess its relevance to the journal's scope and adherence to submission guidelines. If the manuscript meets these criteria, it is then assigned to at least two independent expert reviewers who possess relevant expertise in the field of pig farming. This double-blind peer review process ensures that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous, thereby minimizing bias and promoting impartiality in the evaluation of the research.

Reviewers are tasked with critically assessing the manuscript for originality, methodological rigor, clarity, and significance of the findings. They provide constructive feedback and recommendations for improvement, which may include suggestions for revisions or additional experiments. Following the review, the editorial team consolidates the feedback and communicates it to the authors, who are given the opportunity to address the reviewers' comments and resubmit their revised manuscript. The editorial team then makes a final decision regarding publication based on the reviewers' evaluations and the authors' responses.

This thorough review procedure not only enhances the quality of published articles but also fosters a collaborative environment for researchers in the field of pig farming. By adhering to this process, the African Journal of Pig Farming aims to contribute valuable insights and advancements in the industry, ultimately supporting the growth and sustainability of pig farming practices across the continent.