Review Procedure

The review procedure for Advances in Aquaculture and Fisheries Management follows a rigorous and transparent process designed to ensure the publication of high-quality research. Upon submission, manuscripts are initially screened by the editorial team to assess their alignment with the journal's scope and standards. This preliminary review includes checks for originality, relevance, and adherence to submission guidelines. Manuscripts that pass this stage are assigned to subject-matter experts from the editorial board or external reviewers for a detailed peer-review process.

The peer-review process is double-blind, ensuring that the identities of both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to uphold impartiality. Reviewers are tasked with evaluating the manuscript's scientific merit, methodology, clarity of presentation, and contribution to the field. They provide constructive feedback and recommendations for acceptance, revision, or rejection. In cases where conflicting reviews arise, additional reviewers may be consulted to reach a balanced decision.

Authors are required to address all reviewer comments thoroughly during the revision process. Revised manuscripts undergo further scrutiny to confirm that all concerns have been adequately addressed. Once the reviewers and editors are satisfied with the revisions, the manuscript is accepted for publication.

Throughout the process, the editorial team maintains open communication with authors, providing updates on the manuscript's status. The entire review procedure is guided by the principles of transparency, fairness, and the promotion of scientific excellence, ensuring that published articles contribute significantly to the advancement of aquaculture and fisheries management.